Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/17674
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorGravena, Waleska-
dc.contributor.authorFarias, Izeni P.-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Maria Nazareth Ferreira da-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Vera Maria Ferreira da-
dc.contributor.authorHrbek, Tomas-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-15T21:48:45Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-15T21:48:45Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/17674-
dc.description.abstractIn the present study we tested if a series of 18 rapids on the upper Madeira River form an effective barrier to gene flow, and in particular if they delimit the distribution of the boto Inia boliviensis-which it is believed to occurs only in the Bolivian sub-basin, above the rapids-and I. geoffrensis, which occurs throughout the Amazon basin and below the upper Madeira River rapids. We analyzed 125 individuals from the Madeira River basin sampled from upstream and downstream of the rapids. As the two species are morphologically similar, we used diagnostic molecular characters from known reference specimens to assign individuals to species. We observed that all individuals of Inia from the Bolivian sub-basin up to almost the mouth of the Madeira River belong to the species I. boliviensis. Therefore we concluded that the rapids do not delimit the distribution of I. boliviensis upstream and I. geoffrensis downstream of the rapids as previously hypothesized. Since we registered I. boliviensis along almost the entire length of the Madeira River, we estimated gene flow, time of divergence and effective population sizes of the upstream (Bolivian) and downstream (Madeira River) groups of I. boliviensis using IMa2. We concluded that gene flow is uni-directional from the upstream to the downstream group. Divergence time between the two groups was estimated to have occurred ~122 thousand years ago. The coalescent effective population size for the upstream group was estimated at ~131 thousand individuals, while for the downstream group it was estimated at ~102 thousand individuals. Recently two dams have been constructed in the region of the rapids; neither has a mechanism that will maintain connectivity between the upstream and downstream regions, and together with anthropogenic alterations to the hydrodynamic regime and ecology of the river will likely pose serious long-term and short-term consequences for I. boliviensis and other aquatic taxa. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.en
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVolume 15, Número 3, Pags. 619-629pt_BR
dc.rightsRestrito*
dc.subjectAnthropogenic Effecten
dc.subjectCetaceanen
dc.subjectDivergenceen
dc.subjectDolphinen
dc.subjectEffective Population Sizeen
dc.subjectGene Flowen
dc.subjectHydrodynamicsen
dc.subjectMolecular Analysisen
dc.subjectMorphologyen
dc.subjectTaxonomyen
dc.subjectAmazon Basinen
dc.subjectBoliviaen
dc.subjectMadeira Basinen
dc.subjectCetaceaen
dc.subjectIniaen
dc.subjectInia Geoffrensisen
dc.subjectIniidaeen
dc.titleLooking to the past and the future: Were the Madeira River rapids a geographical barrier to the boto (Cetacea: Iniidae)?en
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10592-014-0565-4-
dc.publisher.journalConservation Geneticspt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.