Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/123/1800
Título: Why a 100-year time horizon should be used for global warming mitigation calculations
Autor(es): Philip Martin Fearnside
Assunto: Aquecimento Global
Carbono
Efeito Estufa
ISSN: 1381-2386
Revista: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
Volume: 7
Resumo: Global warming mitigation calculationsrequire consistent procedures for handlingtime in order to compare `permanent' gainsfrom energy-sector mitigation options with`impermanent' gains from many forest-sectoroptions. A critical part of carbonaccounting methodologies such as thosebased on `ton-years' (the product of thenumber of tons of carbon times the numberof years that each ton is held out of theatmosphere) is definition of a timehorizon, or the time period over whichcarbon impacts and benefits are considered. Here a case is made for using a timehorizon of 100 years. This choice avoidsdistortions created by much longer timehorizons that would lead to decisionsinconsistent with societal behavior inother spheres; it also avoids a rapidincrease in the implied value of time ifhorizons shorter than 100 years are used.Selection of a time horizon affectsdecisions on financial mechanisms andcarbon credit. Simple adaptations canallow a time horizon to be specified andused to calculate mitigation benefits andat the same time reserve a given percentageof weight in decision making forgenerations beyond the end of the timehorizon. The choice of a time horizon willheavily influence whether mitigationoptions such as avoided deforestation areconsidered viable.
URI: http://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/123/1800
ISSN: 1381-2386
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015885027530
Aparece nas coleções:Coordenação de Dinâmica Ambiental (CDAM)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons