Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15391
Title: Limited carbon and biodiversity co-benefits for tropical forest mammals and birds
Authors: Beaudrot, Lydia H.
Kroetz, Kailin M.
Álvarez-Loayza, Patricia
Amaral, Iêda Leão do
Breuer, Thomas
Fletcher, Christine Dawn
Jansen, Patrick A.
Kenfack, David
Lima, Marcela Guimarães Moreira
Marshall, Andrew Robert
Martin, Emanuel H.
Ndoundou-Hockemba, Mireille
O'Brien, Timothy G.
Razafimahaimodison, Jean Claude A.
Romero-Saltos, Hugo
Rovero, F.
Roy, Cisquet Hector
Sheil, Douglas
Silva, Carlos E.F.
Spironello, Wilson Roberto
Valencia, Renato L.
Zvoleff, Alexander
Ahumada, Jorge A.
Andelman, Sandy J.
Keywords: Aboveground Biomass
Biodiversity
Biogenic Emission
Bird
Carbon Sequestration
Climate Change
Conservation Planning
Deforestation
Environmental Monitoring
Greenhouse Gas
Mammal
Prioritization
Species Diversity
Tropical Forest
Videography
Wildlife Management
Animalsia
Aves
Mammalia
Carbon
Animals
Biodiversity
Bird
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental Protection
Forest
Mammal
Physiology
Tropic Climate
Animal
Biodiversity
Birds
Carbon
Conservation Of Natural Resources
Environmental Monitoring
Forests
Mammals
Tropical Climate
Issue Date: 2016
metadata.dc.publisher.journal: Ecological Applications
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: Volume 26, Número 4, Pags. 1098-1111
Abstract: The conservation of tropical forest carbon stocks offers the opportunity to curb climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and simultaneously conserve biodiversity. However, there has been considerable debate about the extent to which carbon stock conservation will provide benefits to biodiversity in part because whether forests that contain high carbon density in their aboveground biomass also contain high animal diversity is unknown. Here, we empirically examined medium to large bodied ground-dwelling mammal and bird (hereafter "wildlife") diversity and carbon stock levels within the tropics using camera trap and vegetation data from a pantropical network of sites. Specifically, we tested whether tropical forests that stored more carbon contained higher wildlife species richness, taxonomic diversity, and trait diversity. We found that carbon stocks were not a significant predictor for any of these three measures of diversity, which suggests that benefits for wildlife diversity will not be maximized unless wildlife diversity is explicitly taken into account; prioritizing carbon stocks alone will not necessarily meet biodiversity conservation goals. We recommend conservation planning that considers both objectives because there is the potential for more wildlife diversity and carbon stock conservation to be achieved for the same total budget if both objectives are pursued in tandem rather than independently. Tropical forests with low elevation variability and low tree density supported significantly higher wildlife diversity. These tropical forest characteristics may provide more affordable proxies of wildlife diversity for future multi-objective conservation planning when fine scale data on wildlife are lacking. © 2016 by the Ecological Society of America.
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: 10.1890/15-0935
Appears in Collections:Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
artigo-inpa.pdf433,31 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons