Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/16134
Título: Genetic variability of wild and captivity populations of Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier, 1818)
Título(s) alternativo(s): Variabilidade genética de populações selvagens e de cativeiro de Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier, 1818)
Autor: Santos, Carlos Henrique dos Anjos dos
Leitão, Marco Aurélio de Brito
Sousa, Carolina Fernandes Silva de
Santana, Givanildo Ximenes
Nazaré Paula-Silva, Maria de
Val, Vera Maria Fonseca Almeida e
Palavras-chave: Isoenzyme
Agricultural Worker
Allele
Colossoma Macropomum
Controlled Study
Fbp 2 Gene
Fish
G6pdh 2 Gene
G6pdh 3 Gene
Gene
Gene Frequency
Gene Locus
Gene Number
Genetic Distance
Polymorphism, Genetic
Genetic Variability
Heterozygosity
Nonhuman
Pgi 1 Gene
Pgi 2 Gene
Pgm 1 Gene
Pisciculture
Genetics, Population
Population Research
Wild Animals
Animalsia
Colossoma Macropomum
Colossoma Marcopomum
Data do documento: 2012
Revista: Acta Scientiarum - Biological Sciences
É parte de: Volume 34, Número 2, Pags. 191-197
Abstract: Tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) is among the most important fish species of the Amazon and one of the most cultivated in Brazil. In the present work we have evaluated the genetic variability of wild and captivity populations of C. macropomum. Enzymatic markers were used to estimate the genetic variability of 41 specimens from a wild group; and 30, 33 and 45 from three captivity groups, which came from Pentecostes (Ceará State), Jaboticabal (São Paulo State) and Itacoatiara (Amazonas State), respectively. Nine isoenzymic systems were used to evaluate the genetic variability of these populations. Using zimogram data we obtained the polymorphism level, allele number, allelic frequency, observed and expected heterozigosity, Wright F statistics (F IS, F ST), genetic distance, level of similarity and group analysis. The isoenzymic data showed that, from the nine systems, six presented polymorphic loci (Fbp-2, G6pdh-2, G6pdh-3, Pgi-1, Pgi-2 and Pgm-1). The populations from Pentecostes and Jaboticabal presented loss of genetic variability and low heterozigosity, compared to the wild population and to the artificial population acquired at Itacoatiara fish farm. Based on these results and on fish farmer information we could consider the population from Itacoatiara as recently derived from a wild population. Concluding, we suggest that the artificial populations of tambaqui, which contain animals originated from this funding population at Pentecostes, should be renewed with the introduction of a new group of individuals with genetic variability equivalent to the wild population.
DOI: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v34i2.7149
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
artigo-inpa.pdf603,65 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons