Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/17755
Título: Epidemiology of cutaneous leishmaniasis in central Amazonia: A comparison of sex-biased incidence among rural settlers and field biologists
Autor: Soares, Letícia
Abad-Franch, Fernando
Ferraz, Gonçalo
Palavras-chave: Bayesian Analysis
Comparative Study
Disease Incidence
Disease Vector
Epidemiology
Fly
Gender Issue
Leishmaniasis
Questionnaire Survey
Rural Area
Adult
Brasil
Controlled Study
Environmental Exposure
Female
Gender Bias
Human
Incidence
Major Clinical Study
Male
Morbidity
Prediction
Prevalence
Questionnaires
Risk Factor
Rural Area
Self Report
Skin Leishmaniasis
Amazonia
Analyse Bayésienne
Análisis Bayesiano
Bayesian Analysis
Environmental Exposure
Exposición Ambiental
Exposition À L'environnement
Leishmania (viannia) Guyanensis
Phlebotominae
Phlébotomie
Adolescent
Adult
Animal
Bayes Theorem
Ecosystem
Environmental Exposure
Female
Humans
Incidence
Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous
Male
Questionnaires
Research Personnel
Rivers
Rural Population
Sex Factors
South America
Young Adult
Data do documento: 2014
Revista: Tropical Medicine and International Health
É parte de: Volume 19, Número 8, Pags. 988-995
Abstract: Objective: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is more frequently reported in men than in women; this may be due to male-biased exposure to CL vectors, female-biased resistance against the disease or both. We sought to determine whether gender-specific exposure to vector habitats explains male-biased CL incidence in two human populations of central Amazonia. Methods: We compared the CL incidence in one population of field researchers (N = 166), with similar exposure for males and females, and one population of rural settlers (N = 646), where exposure is overall male-biased. We used a combination of questionnaires and clinical data to quantify CL cases, and modelled disease incidence in a Bayesian framework. Results: There was a moderately higher incidence of CL among men than among women in both populations, but male bias decreased as exposure time increased. Disease incidence was overall higher among field researchers, suggesting that they are an important but understudied CL risk group. Conclusion: Our comparison of two contrasting populations provided epidemiological evidence that CL incidence can be male-biased even when exposure is comparable in both sexes. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12337
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.