Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/14535
Título: Larval Biometry of Simulium rubrithorax (Diptera: Simuliidae) and Size Comparison between Populations in the States of Minas Gerais and Roraima, Brazil
Autor: Alvan-Aguilar, Miriam Adriana
Hamada, Neusa
Palavras-chave: Water
Analysis
Biometry
Comparative Study
Controlled Study
Developmental Stage
Egg
Fly
Frequency Analysis
Geographical Variation (species)
Gill
Growth
Head
Larva
Measurement
Nonhuman
Population
Simulium
Simulium Rubrithorax
Species
Student T Test
Water Temperature
Animals
Female
Fly
Growth, Development And Aging
Histology
Larva
Male
Temperature
Diptera
Hexapoda
Nematocera
Simuliidae
Simulium Nigricoxum
Simulium Rubrithorax
Animal
Biometry
Female
Larva
Male
Simuliidae
Temperature
Data do documento: 2003
Revista: Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
É parte de: Volume 98, Número 4, Pags. 507-511
Abstract: The number of larval instars of Simulium (Hemicnetha) rubrithorax Lutz (Diptera: Nematocera) was determined using the lateral length of the head capsule. In this study 1,035 larvae, of different sizes, were measured (639 from the state of Roraima and 396 from the state of Minas Gerais). A frequency distribution analysis was carried out on the measurements of the lateral length of the head capsule to determine the number of larval instars. The limits of each instar were defined by the lower frequency of the measurements falling in a range of values, by the presence of the "egg burster" that characterizes the first larval instar, and by the developmental stage of the gill histoblast. The determination of the instar number was tested using a Student's t-test (p < 0.05), the Dyar rule and the Crosby growth rule. The results indicate the existence of 7 larval instars for this species, although this result was not in accordance to the Crosby rule. Last-instar larvae from two widely separated geographical populations (Roraima and Minas Gerais), collected in habitats with different water temperature were compared and no differences (p > 0.05) were observed between them.
DOI: 10.1590/S0074-02762003000400015
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
artigo-inpa.pdf735,73 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons