Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item:
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/14857
Título: | Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests |
Autor: | Barlow, Jos Gardner, Toby Alan Araújo, Ivanei Souza Ávila-Pires, Teresa Cristina Sauer Bonaldo, Alexandre Bragio Costa, Joana E. Espósito, Maria Cristina Ferreira, Leandro Valle Hawes, Joseph E. Hernández, Malva Isabel Medina Hoogmoed, Marinus Steven Leite, Rafael N. Lo-Man-Hung, N. F. Malcolm, Jay R. Martíns, Marlúcia Bonifácio Mestre, Luiz Augusto Macedo Miranda-Santos, Ronildon Nunes-Gutjahr, Ana Lúcia Overal, William L. Parry, Luke Peters, Sandra L. Ribeiro-Júnior, Marco A. Silva, Maria Nazareth Ferreira da Motta, Catarina da Silva Peres, Carlos A. |
Palavras-chave: | Biodiversity Community Structure Conservation Biology Environmental Monitoring Forest Habitat Land Use Priority Journal Taxonomy Tropics Biodiversity Forestry Tropical Climate Aves Euglossini Papilionoidea |
Data do documento: | 2007 |
Revista: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |
É parte de: | Volume 104, Número 47, Pags. 18555-18560 |
Abstract: | Biodiversity loss from deforestation may be partly offset by the expansion of secondary forests and plantation forestry in the tropics. However, our current knowledge of the value of these habitats for biodiversity conservation is limited to very few taxa, and many studies are severely confounded by methodological shortcomings. We examined the conservation value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests for 15 taxonomic groups using a robust and replicated sample design that minimized edge effects. Different taxa varied markedly in their response to patterns of land use in terms of species richness and the percentage of species restricted to primary forest (varying from 5% to 57%), yet almost all between-forest comparisons showed marked differences in community structure and composition. Cross-taxon congruence in response patterns was very weak when evaluated using abundance or species richness data, but much stronger when using metrics based upon community similarity. Our results show that, whereas the biodiversity indicator group concept may hold some validity for several taxa that are frequently sampled (such as birds and fruit-feeding butterflies), it fails for those exhibiting highly idiosyncratic responses to tropical land-use change (including highly vagile species groups such as bats and orchid bees), highlighting the problems associated with quantifying the biodiversity value of anthropogenic habitats. Finally, although we show that areas of native regeneration and exotic tree plantations can provide complementary conservation services, we also provide clear empirical evidence demonstrating the irreplaceable value of primary forests. © 2007 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA. |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.0703333104 |
Aparece nas coleções: | Artigos |
Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
artigo-inpa.pdf | 639,13 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons