Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15438
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPowell, Luke L.-
dc.contributor.authorStouffer, Philip C.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-08T20:46:14Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-08T20:46:14Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15438-
dc.description.abstractAs anthropogenic change continues to fragment terrestrial habitats, conservation biologists are increasingly concerned with how wild animals move through fragmented landscapes. Experimental translocations have recently gained popularity as a technique to determine landscape permeability by wild animals in fragmented landscapes. In experimental translocations, researchers capture individuals — usually adults — and release them elsewhere in order to determine whether they are able to cross the landscape and return to their original location. We argue that most experimental translocations have two inherent confounding factors — age of the individual and homing ability — and that the narrow spatiotemporal scale of the technique may give it limited ability to address the most important conservation and management questions in fragmented landscapes. We discuss three alternative techniques (telemetry, capture-mark-recapture, and landscape genetics), and recommend that experimental translocations only be undertaken if: 1) they avoid confounding factors; 2) they are validated by other techniques; and 3) no other options are available for obtaining the data. We stress that researchers that do proceed with experimental translocations must acknowledge that they are using an indirect proxy to quantify natural animal movement. © 2015 Sociedade Brasileira de Ornitologia. All rights reserved.en
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVolume 22, Número 4, Pags. 311-316pt_BR
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/*
dc.subjectAgeen
dc.subjectAnimalsen
dc.subjectAnthropogenic Effecten
dc.subjectConnectivityen
dc.subjectConservation Managementen
dc.subjectData Seten
dc.subjectDispersalen
dc.subjectExperimental Studyen
dc.subjectHabitat Fragmentationen
dc.subjectHoming Behavioren
dc.subjectLandscapeen
dc.subjectMark-recapture Methoden
dc.subjectMovementen
dc.subjectPermeabilityen
dc.subjectSpatio-temporal Analysisen
dc.subjectTelemetryen
dc.subjectTerrestrial Environmenten
dc.subjectWild Populationen
dc.subjectAnimalsiaen
dc.titleExperimental translocations: Pitfalls and alternatives for quantifying animal movement in fragmented landscapesen
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.publisher.journalRevista Brasileira de Ornitologiapt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
artigo-inpa.pdf96,73 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons