Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Standardized Assessment of Biodiversity Trends in Tropical Forest Protected Areas: The End Is Not in Sight|
|Authors:||Beaudrot, Lydia H.|
Ahumada, Jorge A.
O’Brien, Timothy L.
Fegraus, Eric H.
Fletcher, Christine Dawn
Hallam, Chris D.
Jansen, Patrick A.
Lima, Marcela Guimarães Moreira
Martin, Emanuel H.
Razafimahaimodison, Jean Claude A.
Santos, Fernanda da Silva
Spironello, Wilson Roberto
Willig, Michael R.
Winarni, Nurul Laksmi
Andelman, Sandy J.
Tropical Rain Forest
Conservation Of Natural Resources
|metadata.dc.relation.ispartof:||Volume 14, Número 1|
|Abstract:||Extinction rates in the Anthropocene are three orders of magnitude higher than background and disproportionately occur in the tropics, home of half the world’s species. Despite global efforts to combat tropical species extinctions, lack of high-quality, objective information on tropical biodiversity has hampered quantitative evaluation of conservation strategies. In particular, the scarcity of population-level monitoring in tropical forests has stymied assessment of biodiversity outcomes, such as the status and trends of animal populations in protected areas. Here, we evaluate occupancy trends for 511 populations of terrestrial mammals and birds, representing 244 species from 15 tropical forest protected areas on three continents. For the first time to our knowledge, we use annual surveys from tropical forests worldwide that employ a standardized camera trapping protocol, and we compute data analytics that correct for imperfect detection. We found that occupancy declined in 22%, increased in 17%, and exhibited no change in 22% of populations during the last 3–8 years, while 39% of populations were detected too infrequently to assess occupancy changes. Despite extensive variability in occupancy trends, these 15 tropical protected areas have not exhibited systematic declines in biodiversity (i.e., occupancy, richness, or evenness) at the community level. Our results differ from reports of widespread biodiversity declines based on aggregated secondary data and expert opinion and suggest less extreme deterioration in tropical forest protected areas. We simultaneously fill an important conservation data gap and demonstrate the value of large-scale monitoring infrastructure and powerful analytics, which can be scaled to incorporate additional sites, ecosystems, and monitoring methods. In an era of catastrophic biodiversity loss, robust indicators produced from standardized monitoring infrastructure are critical to accurately assess population outcomes and identify conservation strategies that can avert biodiversity collapse. © 2016 Beaudrot et al.|
|Appears in Collections:||Artigos|
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License