Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item:
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/16887
Título: | Spatial distance and climate determine modularity in a cross-biomes plant–hummingbird interaction network in Brazil |
Autor: | Araujo, Andréa Cardoso de Martín González, Ana M. Sandel, Brody S. Maruyama, Pietro Kiyoshi Fischer, Erich Vizentin-Bugoni, Jeferson Araújo, Francielle Paulina de Coelho, Aline Góes Faria, R. R. Kohler, Glauco Las-Casas, Flor Maria Guedes Lopes, Ariadna Valentina Machado, Adriana Oliveira Machado, Caio Graco Machado, I. C. McGuire, Jimmy A. Moura, Alan Cerqueira Oliveira, Genilda M. Oliveira, Paulo E. Rocca, Márcia Alexandra Rodrigues, Licléia da Cruz Rodrigues, Marcos Rui, Ana Maria Sazima, Ivan Sazima, Marlies And I. Varassin, Isabela Galarda Wang, Zhiheng Dalsgaard, Bo Svenning, Jens Christian |
Palavras-chave: | Biogeography Biome Bird Climate Change Connectivity Ecological Modeling Life History Trait Morphology Ornithophily Phylogenetics Phylogeny Range Size Spatial Analysis Animalsia Trochilidae |
Data do documento: | 2018 |
Revista: | Journal of Biogeography |
É parte de: | Volume 45, Número 8, Pags. 1846-1858 |
Abstract: | Aim: We examined the effects of space, climate, phylogeny and species traits on module composition in a cross-biomes plant–hummingbird network. Location: Brazil, except Amazonian region. Methods: We compiled 31 local binary plant–hummingbird networks, combining them into one cross-biomes metanetwork. We conducted a modularity analysis and tested the relationship between species’ module membership with traits, geographical location, climatic conditions and range sizes, employing random forest models. We fitted reduced models containing groups of related variables (climatic, spatial, phylogenetic, traits) and combinations of groups to partition the variance explained by these sets into unique and shared components. Results: The Brazilian cross-biomes network was composed of 479 plant and 42 hummingbird species, and showed significant modularity. The resulting six modules conformed well to vegetation domains. Only plant traits, not hummingbird traits, differed between modules, notably plants’ growth form, corolla length, flower shape and colour. Some modules included plant species with very restricted distributions, whereas others encompassed more widespread ones. Widespread hummingbirds were the most connected, both within and between modules, whereas widespread plants were the most connected between modules. Among traits, only nectar concentration had a weak effect on among-module connectivity. Main conclusions: Climate and spatial filters were the main determinants of module composition for hummingbirds and plants, potentially related to resource seasonality, especially for hummingbirds. Historical dispersal-linked contingency, or environmental variations not accounted for by the explanatory factors here evaluated, could also contribute to the spatial component. Phylogeny and morphological traits had no unique effects on the assignment of species to modules. Widespread species showed higher within- and/or among-module connectivity, indicating their key role connecting biomes, and, in the case of hummingbirds, communities within biomes. Our results indicate that biogeography and climate not only determine the variation of modularity in local plant–animal networks, as previously shown, but also affect the cross-biomes network structure. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
DOI: | 10.1111/jbi.13367 |
Aparece nas coleções: | Artigos |
Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.
Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.