Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/17398
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorFagundes, Camila Kurzmann-
dc.contributor.authorVogt, Richard Carl-
dc.contributor.authorMarco Júnior, Paulo de-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-15T21:42:13Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-15T21:42:13Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/17398-
dc.description.abstractAim: We used chelonian distribution data to (1) predict suitable areas of the occurrence for freshwater turtle species using species distribution models and (2) evaluate whether these species are protected by the current network of protected areas (PAs). Location: The Brazilian Amazon. Methods: We generated predictions of suitable areas for chelonian occurrence based on BIOCLIM, SVM, GLM and maximum entropy modelling procedures. We used maximum entropy to run the gap analysis and compared the effectiveness of three kinds of protected areas with different levels of protection: (1) integral protection areas (IPA) only; (2) integral protection areas + sustainable use areas (IPA+SUA); and (3) integral protection areas + sustainable use areas + indigenous lands (IPA + SUA + IL). Results: We identified only one full gap species, Mesoclemmys nasuta, whose distribution is not included in any PAs. Other chelonian species have at least a portion of their distribution included in PAs. Some protected species and partial gap species occur in areas with high rates of deforestation. Considering PAs with the highest level of protection (IPA), only Rhinoclemmys punctularia and Kinosternon scorpioides achieve their conservation targets. In the IPA + SUA scenario, conservation targets of some species with small range sizes are not achieved. When all PA types were considered (IPA + SUA + IL), only two species fail to achieve their conservation targets, Acanthochelys macrocephala and M. nasuta. Main conclusions: Despite the large number of PAs in the Brazilian Amazon, IPAs alone are not sufficient for capturing suitable areas for freshwater turtles. The inclusion of SUA and IL is crucial for achieving coverage targets for most species. However, chelonians may be overharvested in SUAs and ILs, due to their importance as a food resource. Areas that have high turtle richness next to existing PAs and the needs of traditional cultures should be considered in management planning for freshwater turtles. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltden
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVolume 22, Número 2, Pags. 123-135pt_BR
dc.rightsRestrito*
dc.subjectDeforestationen
dc.subjectEfficiency Measurementen
dc.subjectFreshwater Ecosystemen
dc.subjectMaximum Entropy Analysisen
dc.subjectPopulation Distributionen
dc.subjectProtected Areaen
dc.subjectRange Sizeen
dc.subjectSpecies Conservationsen
dc.subjectSpecies Occurrenceen
dc.subjectSpecies Richnessen
dc.subjectTurtleen
dc.subjectVulnerabilityen
dc.subjectAmazoniaen
dc.subjectAcanthochelys Macrocephalaen
dc.subjectKinosternon Scorpioidesen
dc.subjectPhrynopsen
dc.subjectRhinoclemmys Punctulariaen
dc.subjectTestudinesen
dc.titleTesting the efficiency of protected areas in the Amazon for conserving freshwater turtlesen
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ddi.12396-
dc.publisher.journalDiversity and Distributionspt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.