Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18033
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Natália Dayane Moura-
dc.contributor.authorGross, Maria Claudia-
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Carlos Henrique-
dc.contributor.authorTerêncio, Maria Leandra-
dc.contributor.authorZuanon, Jansen-
dc.contributor.authorFeldberg, Eliana-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-15T21:51:07Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-15T21:51:07Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18033-
dc.description.abstractSynbranchidae belongs to the Synbranchiformes and occurs in Africa, Asia, Australia, Mexico, and Central and South America. This family comprises four genera: Synbranchus, Ophisternon, Monopterus, and Macrotrema. Only two are known from the neotropical region, Ophisternon and Synbranchus. According to current classification, Synbranchus has three valid species: S. marmoratus (Bloch 1795), S. madeirae (Rosen and Rumney 1972), and S. lampreia (Favorito, Zanata and Assumpção 2005). Thus the present research is aimed to cytogenetically characterize (by classical and molecular methods) two syntopic species-S. aff. lampreia and S. madeirae-from the central Amazon basin to validate the taxonomy of both species and provide a revisionary discussion on the cytogenetics of Synbranchiformes. Synbranchus aff. lampreia was found to possess 2n = 44 chromosomes (6 m + 2st + 36a, NF = 50), while S. madeirae had 2n = 46 chromosomes (6 m + 2st + 38a, NF = 52). Constitutive heterochromatin was dominant in the centromeric and terminal regions of most of the chromosomes in both species, although the precise distribution patterns were species-specific. The nucleolar organizing region was single in S. aff. lampreia and multiple in S. madeirae, as indicated by both AgNO3 and hybridization using 18S rDNA probes. The 5S rDNA sites were located interstitially on the long arms of an acrocentric pair in both species, and the telomeric probe did not show any interstitial sites in either species. These data indicate the occurrence of interspecific karyotypic variability in Synbranchus and suggest that taxonomic review for this genus is necessary. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.en
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVolume 140, Número 4-6, Pags. 149-158pt_BR
dc.rightsRestrito*
dc.subjectRibosome Dnaen
dc.subjectAnimalsen
dc.subjectChromosomeen
dc.subjectChromosome Analysisen
dc.subjectChromosome Banding Patternen
dc.subjectComparative Studyen
dc.subjectIn Situ Hybridization, Fluorescenceen
dc.subjectGeneticsen
dc.subjectKaryotypeen
dc.subjectSmegmamorphaen
dc.subjectAnimalen
dc.subjectChromosome Bandingen
dc.subjectChromosomesen
dc.subjectCytogenetic Analysisen
dc.subjectRibosomal Dnaen
dc.subjectIn Situ Hybridization, Fluorescenceen
dc.subjectKaryotypeen
dc.subjectSmegmamorphaen
dc.subjectOphisternonen
dc.subjectSynbranchidaeen
dc.subjectSynbranchiformesen
dc.subjectSynbranchusen
dc.subjectSynbranchus Marmoratusen
dc.titleCytogenetics of Synbranchiformes: A comparative analysis of two Synbranchus Bloch, 1795 species from the Amazonen
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10709-012-9666-5-
dc.publisher.journalGeneticapt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.