Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18131
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Luke-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Tienming-
dc.contributor.authorKoh, Lian Pin-
dc.contributor.authorBrook, Barry W.-
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Toby Alan-
dc.contributor.authorBarlow, Jos-
dc.contributor.authorPeres, Carlos A.-
dc.contributor.authorBradshaw, Corey J.A.-
dc.contributor.authorLaurance, William F.-
dc.contributor.authorLovejoy, Thomas E.-
dc.contributor.authorSodhi, Navjot S.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-15T21:51:54Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-15T21:51:54Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18131-
dc.description.abstractHuman-driven land-use changes increasingly threaten biodiversity, particularly in tropical forests where both species diversity and human pressures on natural environments are high. The rapid conversion of tropical forests for agriculture, timber production and other uses has generated vast, human-dominated landscapes with potentially dire consequences for tropical biodiversity. Today, few truly undisturbed tropical forests exist, whereas those degraded by repeated logging and fires, as well as secondary and plantation forests, are rapidly expanding. Here we provide a global assessment of the impact of disturbance and land conversion on biodiversity in tropical forests using a meta-analysis of 138 studies. We analysed 2,220 pairwise comparisons of biodiversity values in primary forests (with little or no human disturbance) and disturbed forests. We found that biodiversity values were substantially lower in degraded forests, but that this varied considerably by geographic region, taxonomic group, ecological metric and disturbance type. Even after partly accounting for confounding colonization and succession effects due to the composition of surrounding habitats, isolation and time since disturbance, we find that most forms of forest degradation have an overwhelmingly detrimental effect on tropical biodiversity. Our results clearly indicate that when it comes to maintaining tropical biodiversity, there is no substitute for primary forests. © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.en
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVolume 478, Número 7369, Pags. 378-381pt_BR
dc.rightsRestrito*
dc.subjectBiodiversityen
dc.subjectColonizationen
dc.subjectHabitat Conservationen
dc.subjectHabitat Fragmentationen
dc.subjectHuman Activityen
dc.subjectLand-use Changeen
dc.subjectLogging (timber)en
dc.subjectMeta Analysisen
dc.subjectPlantationen
dc.subjectSuccessionen
dc.subjectTropical Foresten
dc.subjectBiodiversityen
dc.subjectEnvironmental Impacten
dc.subjectFireen
dc.subjectForesten
dc.subjectHabitaten
dc.subjectLand Useen
dc.subjectLoggingen
dc.subjectPriority Journalen
dc.subjectSpecies Diversityen
dc.subjectSustainable Developmenten
dc.subjectTropical Rain Foresten
dc.titlePrimary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversityen
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/nature10425-
dc.publisher.journalNaturept_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.