Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18322
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorUríarte, Ma?ia-
dc.contributor.authorBruna, Emilio M.-
dc.contributor.authorRubim, Paulo-
dc.contributor.authorAnciães, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorJonckheere, Inge G.C.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-15T21:53:41Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-15T21:53:41Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18322-
dc.description.abstractStudies simultaneously evaluating the importance of safe-site and seed limitation for plant establishment are rare, particularly in human-modified landscapes. We used spatially explicit neighborhood models together with data from 10 0.5-ha mapped census plots in a fragmented landscape spanning 1000 km2 to (1) evaluate the relative importance of seed production, dispersal, and safe-site limitation for the recruitment of the understory herb Heliconia acuminata; and (2) determine how these processes differ between fragments and continuous forests. Our analyses demonstrated a large degree of variation in seed production, dispersal, and establishment among and within the 10 study plots. Seed production limitation was strong but only at small spatial scales. Average dispersal distance was less than 4 m, leading to severe dispersal limitation at most sites. Overall, safe-site limitation was the most important constraint on seedling establishment. Fragmentation led to a more heterogeneous light environment with negative consequences for seedling establishment but had little effect on seed production or dispersal. These results suggest that the effects of fragmentation on abiotic processes may be more important than the disruption of biotic interactions in driving biodiversity loss in tropical forests, at least for some functional groups. These effects may be common when the matrix surrounding fragments contains enough tree cover to enable movement of dispersere and pollinators. © 2010 by the Ecological Society of America.en
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVolume 91, Número 5, Pags. 1317-1328pt_BR
dc.rightsRestrito*
dc.subjectAnthropogenic Effecten
dc.subjectForest Ecosystemen
dc.subjectFunctional Groupen
dc.subjectHabitat Fragmentationen
dc.subjectLandscape Changeen
dc.subjectMonocotyledonen
dc.subjectPollinatoren
dc.subjectRecruitment (population Dynamics)en
dc.subjectSeed Productionen
dc.subjectSeedling Establishmenten
dc.subjectTropical Foresten
dc.subjectUnderstoryen
dc.subjectBiological Modelen
dc.subjectDemographyen
dc.subjectEcosystemen
dc.subjectEnergy Conservationen
dc.subjectHeliconiaceaeen
dc.subjectPhysiologyen
dc.subjectSeed Planten
dc.subjectSeedlingen
dc.subjectTreeen
dc.subjectConservation Of Energy Resourcesen
dc.subjectDemographyen
dc.subjectEcosystemen
dc.subjectHeliconiaceaeen
dc.subjectModels, Biologicalen
dc.subjectSeedlingen
dc.subjectSeedsen
dc.subjectTreesen
dc.subjectAmazoniaen
dc.subjectHeliconia Acuminataen
dc.titleEffects of forest fragmentation on the seedling recruitment of a tropical herb: Assessing seed vs. safe-site limitationen
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/09-0785.1-
dc.publisher.journalEcologypt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.