Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18326
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorBobrowiec, Paulo Estefano Dineli-
dc.contributor.authorGribel, Rogério-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-15T21:53:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-15T21:53:44Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18326-
dc.description.abstractThe process of secondary succession on degraded lands in the Amazon depends on their land-use histories. In this scenario, little is known about how animal communities respond to different types of secondary vegetation in the region. We examined the effects of abandoned cattle pasture, Vismia- and Cecropia-dominated regrowth on the abundance of bat species and community composition in the Central Amazon, Brazil, based on 11 netting sites and on landscape characteristics. We captured 1444 bats, representing 26 species and two families (Phyllostomidae and Mormoopidae). Among the six most-captured Phyllostomidae bats, Sturnira lilium and Sturnira tildae had significantly higher capture rates in abandoned pasture, while Rhinophylla pumilio predominated in both Vismia- and Cecropia-dominated regrowth. An hybrid multidimensional scaling ordination revealed significant differences in the bat community among the three types of secondary vegetation. Phyllostominae bats were more common and richer in the less-disturbed areas of Cecropia-dominated regrowth, while Stenodermatinae species were more captured in abandoned pastures. Our results suggest that the type of secondary vegetation, together with its land-use history, affects bat community composition in the Central Amazon. The Phyllostominae subfamily (gleaning animalivores) was habitat selective and disappeared from areas experiencing constant disturbances. On the other hand, Stenodermatinae frugivorous bats often used and foraged in altered areas. We suggest that secondary vegetations in more-advanced successional stages can be used to augment the total area protected by forest conservation units. © 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 The Zoological Society of London.en
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVolume 13, Número 2, Pags. 204-216pt_BR
dc.rightsRestrito*
dc.subjectBaten
dc.subjectCommunity Compositionen
dc.subjectHabitat Creationen
dc.subjectOrdinationen
dc.subjectRestoration Ecologyen
dc.subjectRevegetationen
dc.subjectSecondary Foresten
dc.subjectAmazoniaen
dc.subjectBrasilen
dc.subjectAnimalsiaen
dc.subjectBosen
dc.subjectCecropiaen
dc.subjectChiropteraen
dc.subjectLiliumen
dc.subjectMormoopidaeen
dc.subjectPhyllostomidaeen
dc.subjectPhyllostominaeen
dc.subjectRhinophylla Pumilioen
dc.subjectStenodermatinaeen
dc.subjectSturnira Liliumen
dc.subjectSturnira Tildaeen
dc.subjectVismiaen
dc.titleEffects of different secondary vegetation types on bat community composition in Central Amazonia, Brazilen
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00322.x-
dc.publisher.journalAnimal Conservationpt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.