Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18404
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorFearnside, Philip Martin-
dc.contributor.authorRighi, Ciro Abbud-
dc.contributor.authorGraça, Paulo Maurício Lima Alencastro de-
dc.contributor.authorKeizer, Edwin Willem Hermanus-
dc.contributor.authorCerri, Carlos C.-
dc.contributor.authorNogueira, Euler Melo-
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Reinaldo Imbrozio-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-15T21:54:35Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-15T21:54:35Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18404-
dc.description.abstractWe calculate greenhouse-gas emissions from land-use change in Mato Grosso and Rondônia, two states that are responsible for more than half of the deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia. In addition to deforestation (clearing of forest), we also estimate clearing rates and emissions for savannas (especially the cerrado, or central Brazilian savanna), which have not been included in Brazil's monitoring of deforestation. The rate of clearing of savannas was much more rapid in the 1980s and 1990s than in recent years. Over the 2006-2007 period (one year) 204 × 103 ha of forest and 30 × 103 ha of savanna were cleared in Mato Grosso, representing a gross loss of biomass carbon (above + belowground) of 66.0 and 1.8 × 106 MgC, respectively. In the same year in Rondônia, 130 × 103 ha of forest was cleared, representing gross losses of biomass of 40.4 × 106 MgC. Data on clearing of savanna in Rondônia are unavailable, but the rate is believed to be small in the year in question. Net losses of carbon stock for Mato Grosso forest, Mato Grosso savanna and Rondônia forest were 29.0, 0.5 and 18.5 × 106 MgC, respectively. Including soil carbon loss and the effects of trace-gas emissions (using global warming potentials for CH4 and N2O from the IPCC's 2007 Fourth Assessment Report), the impact of these emission sources totaled 30.9, 0.6 and 25.4 × 106 Mg CO2-equivalent C, respectively. These impacts approximate the combined effect of logging and clearing because the forest biomasses used are based on surveys conducted before many forests were exposed to logging. The total emission from Mato Grosso and Rondônia of 56.9 × 106 Mg CO2-equivalent C can be compared with Brazil's annual emission of approximately 80 × 106 MgC from fossil-fuel combustion. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVolume 258, Número 9, Pags. 1968-1978pt_BR
dc.rightsRestrito*
dc.subjectAmazonen
dc.subjectBurningen
dc.subjectCerradoen
dc.subjectRainforesten
dc.subjectSavannaen
dc.subjectTropical Foresten
dc.subjectBiomassen
dc.subjectDeforestationen
dc.subjectFuelsen
dc.subjectGlobal Warmingen
dc.subjectGreenhousesen
dc.subjectLand Useen
dc.subjectLeakage (fluid)en
dc.subjectGas Emissionsen
dc.subjectAnthropogenic Effecten
dc.subjectBiomassen
dc.subjectCerradoen
dc.subjectCombustionen
dc.subjectDeforestationen
dc.subjectEmission Inventoryen
dc.subjectEnvironmental Degradationen
dc.subjectGlobal Warmingen
dc.subjectGreenhouse Gasen
dc.subjectLand-use Changeen
dc.subjectLogging (timber)en
dc.subjectNature-society Relationsen
dc.subjectRainforesten
dc.subjectSavannaen
dc.subjectTropical Foresten
dc.subjectBiomassen
dc.subjectCarbonen
dc.subjectCombustionen
dc.subjectDeforestationen
dc.subjectEmissionen
dc.subjectForestsen
dc.subjectFuelsen
dc.subjectLand Useen
dc.subjectLeakageen
dc.subjectRainen
dc.subjectAmazoniaen
dc.subjectMato Grossoen
dc.subjectRondoniaen
dc.subjectSouth Americaen
dc.titleBiomass and greenhouse-gas emissions from land-use change in Brazil's Amazonian "arc of deforestation": The states of Mato Grosso and Rondôniaen
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.042-
dc.publisher.journalForest Ecology and Managementpt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.