Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18859
Title: | Brazil's Samuel Dam: Lessons for hydroelectric development policy and the environment in Amazonia |
Authors: | Fearnside, Philip Martin |
Keywords: | Contamination Cost-benefit Analysis Decision Making Greenhouse Effect Hydroelectric Power Planning Reservoirs (water) Amazonia Electricity Supply Hydroelectric Dams Dams Mercury Dam Construction Environmental Impact Hydroelectric Power Nature-society Relations Decision Making Electricity Environmental Planning Environmental Protection Flooding Forest Forest Management Greenhouse Effect Logging Reservoir Tropics Water Contamination Water Management Water Supply Animals Cost Disaster Economics Electric Power Plant Electricity Environment Environmental Planning Food Industry Forestry Human River Water Pollution Rondonia Samuel Dam South America Western Hemisphere World Animal Conservation Of Natural Resources Costs And Cost Analysis Decision Making Electricity Environment Environment Design Fisheries Forestry Humans Natural Disasters Power Plants Rivers Water Pollution |
Issue Date: | 2005 |
metadata.dc.publisher.journal: | Environmental Management |
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: | Volume 35, Número 1, Pags. 1-19 |
Abstract: | Brazil's Samuel Dam, which formed a 540-km2 reservoir in the state of Rondônia in 1988, provides lessons for development decisions throughout Amazonia and in other tropical areas. The decision to build the dam was heavily influenced by its role in the political strategies of key decision makers. Samuel illustrates both impacts and benefits of electricity supply and the dilemmas facing decision makers regarding the various options for planned electricity generation. Environmental costs included flooding forest and stimulating illegal logging activity throughout western Amazonia because of an exception opened for Samuel in Brazil's prohibition of export of raw logs. Samuel emitted substantially more greenhouse gases than would have been emitted by generating the same amount of electricity from oil. Contamination of fish in the reservoir resulted from methylation of mercury present in the soil. Social costs of the dam included resettlement of 238 families of farmers; impacts on indigenous people were indirect. Mitigating measures included faunal rescue and creation of a forest reserve. The lessons of Samuel include the need to consider a full range of alternatives prior to making decisions in practice and the importance of adhering to the logical sequence of decision making, where information is gathered and compared prior to the decision. It also shows the need to maintain flexibility when the costs and benefits of different alternatives change significantly over the course of the project's planning and execution, as occurred at Samuel. © 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. |
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: | 10.1007/s00267-004-0100-3 |
Appears in Collections: | Artigos |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.