Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Comparative measurements and seasonal variations in energy and carbon exchange over forest and pasture in South West Amazonia|
|Authors:||Randow, Celso Von|
Manzi, Antônio Ocimar
Kruijt, Bart J.
Oliveira, Paula Afonso de
Zanchi, Fabrício Berton
Silva, Roberta Lane de Oliveira
Hodnett, Martin G.
Gash, John H.C.
Elbers, Jan A.
Waterloo, M. J.
Cardoso, Fernando Luiz
|metadata.dc.publisher.journal:||Theoretical and Applied Climatology|
|metadata.dc.relation.ispartof:||Volume 78, Número 1-3, Pags. 5-26|
|Abstract:||Comparative measurements of radiation flux components and turbulent fluxes of energy and CO2 are made at two sites in South West Amazonia: one in a tropical forest reserve and one in a pasture. The data were collected from February 1999 to September 2002, as part of the Large Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia (LBA). During the dry seasons, although precipitation and specific humidity are greatly reduced, the soil moisture storage profiles down to 3.4 m indicate that the forest vegetation continues to withdraw water from deep layers in the soil. For this reason, seasonal changes observed in the energy partition and CO2 fluxes in the forest are small, compared to the large reductions in evaporation and photosynthesis observed in the pasture. For the radiation balance, the reflected short wave radiation increases by about 55% when changing from forest to pasture. Combined with an increase of 4.7% in long wave radiation loss, this causes an average reduction of 13.3% in net radiation in the pasture, compared to the forest. In the wet season, the evaporative fraction (λE/Rn) at the pasture is 17% lower than at the forest. This difference increases to 24% during the dry season. Daytime CO2 fluxes are 20-28% lower (in absolute values) in the pasture compared to the forest. The nighttime respiration in the pasture is also reduced compared to the forest, with averages 44% and 57% lower in the wet and dry seasons, respectively. As the reduction in the nocturnal respiration is larger than the reduction in the daytime uptake, the combined effect is a 19-67% higher daily uptake of CO2 in the pasture, compared to the forest. This high uptake of CO2 in the pasture site is not surprising, since the growth of the vegetation is constantly renewed, as the cattle remove the biomass. © Springer-Verlag 2004.|
|Appears in Collections:||Artigos|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.