Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/19011
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchroth, G?otz-
dc.contributor.authorCoutinho, Paulo-
dc.contributor.authorMoraes, Vicente Haroldo de Figueiredo-
dc.contributor.authorAlbernaz, Ana Luísa Kerti Mangabeira-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-15T22:04:36Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-15T22:04:36Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/19011-
dc.description.abstractScientific and public attention concerned with natural rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) production in the Amazon has focused on the high-tech practice of double-grafted, leaf blight resistant and high-yielding rubber clones on the one hand, and the low-tech practice of extractive use of natural rubber stands on the other. The intermediate, traditional practice of enriching slash-and-bum plots with rubber trees and managing them in a secondary forest environment, in association with other timber and non-timber species, has largely been overlooked. We present results from a survey of 51 farmer families conducted on the eastern bank of the Tapajós river in the central Brazilian Amazon, focusing on the population zone of the Tapajós National Forest and its northern vicinity. Actively managed rubber agroforests were most common on the sandy river banks and on humus- and clay-rich and ferralitic soils near the edge of the plateau at a few kilometers from the river. There was a gradient in management intensity between the proximity of the villages at the river, where rubber was often a component of homegardens, and the distant groves on the plateau, which often resembled secondary forests. The spatial separation of access to water at the river and more fertile soils on the plateau, the historical practice of abandoning the rubber groves at times of low rubber prices, and a substantial risk of losing plantations to abiotic and biotic threats, especially fire, are identified as factors that have presumably favored the development of agroforests with low management intensity in the region. Although about half of the interviewed farmers expressed a preference for weeded plantations, almost 90% of them extracted vegetal products other than rubber from the agroforests or used them as hunting grounds, and 80% believed that associated vegetation had no negative influence on rubber yields. The often good health of old rubber trees in Amazonian agroforests is explained with lower pressure from root rots, the periodic abandonment and especially a tapping technique that is well adapted to a moist forest environment. © 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVolume 97, Número 1-3, Pags. 151-165pt_BR
dc.rightsRestrito*
dc.subjectAgroforestryen
dc.subjectFarming Systemen
dc.subjectForest Managementen
dc.subjectLand Useen
dc.subjectRubberen
dc.subjectPara Stateen
dc.subjectTapajo National Foresten
dc.subjectHevea Brasiliensisen
dc.subjectHevea Brasiliensisen
dc.subjectRipariaen
dc.titleRubber agroforests at the Tapajós river, Brazilian Amazon - Environmentally benign land use systems in an old forest frontier regionen
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00116-6-
dc.publisher.journalAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environmentpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.