Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/19349
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorSouza Furtado, Maria do Socorro de-
dc.contributor.authorMinami, Paulo Suyoshi-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-15T22:07:41Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-15T22:07:41Z-
dc.date.issued1997-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/19349-
dc.description.abstractThe sensitivity of dermatophytes (89 'wild' and 38 'collections' strains) to griseofulvin and azole derivatives (clotrimazole, cetoconazole, tioconazole, miconazole, econazole, isoconazole and oxiconazole) was studied using 'in vitro' determinations of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC). The broth dilution method was used; the antifungal drugs were used in concentrations between 0,05 to 100 μg/ml. The inoculum was (standardized adjusting the suspension to contain) 1,0 to 1,5 X 106 ufc/ml. The MIC and MFC values showed different results for many fungi strains and different concentrations of antifungal agents. The values for clotrimazole varied from 0,1 to 1,56 μg/ml in almost all strains. Higher values were obtained for T. rubrum (12,5 μg/ml) and T. mentagrophytes (25,0 μg/ml). Cetoconazole was the imidazole drag that showed the highest MIC and MFC values, as high as 100,0 μg/ml when tested against the species of T. rubrum, T. mentagrophytes, T. tonsurans and M. gypseum. The antifungal activities of the other imidazole drugs were comparable, the MIC and MFC values varied from 0,10 to 12,5 μg/ml. In relation to griseofulvin, the fungi used in this study, presented two different behaviours: higher MIC and MFC values (12,5 to 100,0 μg/ml) for T. rubrum, T. mentagrophyte, T. tonsurans, T. soudanense, M. canis, M. gypseum and M. persicolor and lower values (0,39 to 3,12 μg/ml) for T. schoenleinii, T. violaceum, E. floccosum, and M. audouinii. E. floccosum, M. canis and T. schoenleinii had higher susceptibilitis to the drugs, (MIC and MFC values varying from 0,05 to 0,20 μg/ml), when compared to T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, M. gypseum and T. soudanense. No important differences were observed in file MIC and MFC values for the 'wild' and the 'collection' strains.en
dc.language.isopt_BRpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVolume 28, Número 2, Pags. 110-115pt_BR
dc.rightsRestrito*
dc.subjectClotrimazoleen
dc.subjectEconazoleen
dc.subjectGriseofulvinen
dc.subjectImidazole Derivativeen
dc.subjectIsoconazoleen
dc.subjectKetoconazoleen
dc.subjectMiconazoleen
dc.subjectOxiconazoleen
dc.subjectTioconazoleen
dc.subjectAntibiotic Sensitivityen
dc.subjectDermatophyteen
dc.subjectEpidermophyton Floccosumen
dc.subjectFungicidal Activityen
dc.subjectMicrosporumen
dc.subjectMicrosporum Canisen
dc.subjectMicrosporum Gypseumen
dc.subjectMinimum Inhibitory Concentrationen
dc.subjectNonhumanen
dc.subjectTrichophytonen
dc.subjectTrichophyton Mentagrophytesen
dc.subjectTrichophyton Rubrumen
dc.titleIn vitro susceptibility tests of dermatophytes to griseofulvin and imidazole derivativesen
dc.title.alternativeTestes de sensibilidade 'in vitro' de dermatofitos a grieseofulvina e derivados imidazolicospt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.publisher.journalRevista de Microbiologiapt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.