Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/37727
Título: New traps for the capture of aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) and aedes albopictus (skuse) (diptera: Culicidae) eggs and adults
Autor: Silva, Karina Rossi da
Silva, William Ribeiro da
Silva, Bianca Piraccini
Arcos, Adriano Nobre
Ferreira, Francisco Augusto Da Silva
Silva, Joelma Soares da
Pontes, Grafe Oliveira
Roque, Rosemary Aparecida
Tadei, Wanderli Pedro
Silva, Mário Antonio Navarro da
Zequi, João Antonio C.
Data do documento: 2021
Revista: PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
É parte de: Volume 15; Number e0008813
Abstract: The control of arboviruses carried by Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse) can be performed with tools that monitor and reduce the circulation of these vectors. Therefore, the efficiency of four types of traps in capturing A. aegypti and A. albopictus eggs and adults, with the biological product Vectobac WG, was evaluated in the field. For this, 20 traps were installed in two locations, which were in the South (Londrina, Paraná) and North (Manaus, Amazonas) Regions of Brazil, from March to April 2017 and January to February 2018, respectively. The UELtrap-E (standard trap) and UELtrap-EA traps captured A. aegypti and A. albopictus eggs: 1703/1866 eggs in Londrina, and 10268/2149 eggs in Manaus, respectively, and presented high ovitraps positivity index (OPI) values (averages: 100%/100% in Londrina, and 100%/96% in Manaus, respectively); and high egg density index (EDI) values (averages: 68/75 in Londrina, and 411/89 in Manaus, respectively), so they had statistically superior efficiency to that of the CRtrap-E and CRtrap-EA traps in both regions, that captured less eggs and adults: 96/69 eggs in Londrina, and 1091/510 eggs in Manaus, respectively. Also presented lower OPI values (averages: 28%/4% in Londrina, and 88%/60% in Manaus, respectively); and lower EDI values (averages: 10.5/9 in Lon-drina, and 47/30 in Manaus, respectively). The capture ratios of Aedes adults in the UEL-trap-EA and CRtrap-EA traps in Londrina and Manaus were 53.3%/29.5% and 0%/9.8%, respectively. UELtrap-EA can be adopted as efficient tool for Aedes monitoring due to their high sensitivity, low cost and ease of use. © 2021 Rossi da Silva et al.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008813
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos
IPUB

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
New traps for the capture.pdf61,5 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons