Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/37973
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMantelatto, Fernando L.-
dc.contributor.authorPileggi, Leonardo Gomes-
dc.contributor.authorPantaleão, João Alberto Farinelli-
dc.contributor.authorMagalhães, Célio-
dc.contributor.authorVillalobos, José Luis-
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez, Fernando-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-25T15:13:15Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-25T15:13:15Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/37973-
dc.description.abstractThe freshwater shrimp genus Cryphiops Dana, 1852 has a disjunct distribution in North (Mexico) and South (Brazil, Chile) America, and is composed of only six species. The current classification of genera in the Palaemonidae is controversial, based on variable morphological characters, and still far from a clear definition. Cryphiops differs from the speciose genus Macrobrachium Spence Bate, 1868 only by the absence of the hepatic spines on the carapace. Previous studies with a limited dataset suggested the necessity to link morphology and phylogeny to create an internal rearrangement in the genus to resolve the paraphyletic status. Through a molecular phylogenetic approach, the evolutionary relationships are inferred based on four (mitochondrial and nuclear) genes, among all recognized species of Cryphiops and, in combination with a taxonomic revision, a rearrangement in the systematics of the genus is suggested. The absence of hepatic spines on the carapace, the only character used to separate the genus Cryphiops, is subjective and should be considered as a homoplasy. This implies that Cryphiops and Macrobrachium are subjective synonyms and, because the latter genus is much more diverse and widely known, with several economically important species, to avoid confusion and disturbance in nomenclatural stability and keep universality, a proposal for the priority of the older synonym (Cryphiops) to be partially suppressed in favor of maintaining the prevailing use of the younger synonym (Macrobrachium) is presented. As the species of Cryphiops should be accommodated in the genus Macrobrachium, new names to replace three preoccupied specific names that, by this action, resulted to be secondary homonyms are offered. © Fernando L. Mantelatto et al.en
dc.relation.ispartofVolume 2021, Número 2021pt_BR
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/*
dc.subjectFreshwater decapodspt_BR
dc.subjectGenetic variabilitypt_BR
dc.subjectMacrobrachiumpt_BR
dc.subjectMolecular phylogenypt_BR
dc.subjectNeotropical regionpt_BR
dc.subjectPrawnpt_BR
dc.titleMultigene phylogeny and taxonomic revision of american shrimps of the genus cryphiops dana, 1852 (Decapoda, palaemonidae) implies a proposal for reversal of precedence with macrobrachium spence bate, 1868pt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.3897/zookeys.1047.66933-
dc.publisher.journalZooKeysen
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo TamanhoFormato 
Multigene_phylogeny.pdf1,08 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons