Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/38525
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Ricardo-
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Christoph F.J.-
dc.contributor.authorFarneda, Fábio Z.-
dc.contributor.authorLópez Baucells, Adrià-
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Joana Sabino-
dc.contributor.authorHazard, Quentin C.K.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T20:36:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T20:36:20Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/38525-
dc.description.abstractMammals tend to align their most energetically demanding phenological events with periods of peak resource availability. Their reproductive phenology is influenced by local resource availability, potentially leading to geographical variation in their breeding strategy. Although the Amazon is the world’s epicenter of bat diversity, the reproductive phenology of Amazonian bats remains poorly known. Seasonality induces fluctuations in resource availability and most phyllostomid species, crucial agents of seed dispersal, pollination and arthropod suppression in the Neotropics, have been described to exhibit seasonal bimodal polyestry. However, current understanding of phyllostomid reproductive phenology is impaired by the paucity of comparative examinations of the phenologies of sympatric species, using consistent classification schemes based on the number and timing of annual peaks in pregnancy and lactation. Using a multi-year dataset from Central Amazonia, we examined the reproductive phenology of nine bat species (Artibeus concolor, A. obscurus, A. lituratus, Carollia brevicauda, C. perspicillata, Gardnerycteris crenulatum, Lophostoma silvicolum, Rhinophylla pumilio, and Trachops cirrhosus), as well as two feeding ensembles (i.e., frugivores and gleaning animalivores). Only three of the nine species exhibited a bimodal reproductive phenology. Six species and the frugivore ensemble showed unimodal reproductive phenology, while gleaning animalivores displayed an amodal pregnancy pattern. All species except L. silvicolum had their primary pregnancy peak during the mid-dry season. A reproductive peak during the early wet season, or local variation in the duration of the fruiting season may explain the deviation of our observations from the expected bimodal polyestry. © 2022, The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/*
dc.subjectNeotropical batspt_BR
dc.subjectPhyllostomidaept_BR
dc.titleReproductive phenologies of phyllostomid bats in the Central Amazonpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s42991-022-00242-6-
dc.publisher.journalMammalian Biologypt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Repositório do INPA.docx11,04 kBMicrosoft Word XMLVisualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons