Integrating phylogeography and ecological niche modelling to test diversification hypotheses using a Neotropical rodent

dc.contributor.authorMachado, Arielli Fabrício
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Mário S.
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Cláudia Regina
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Marcelo Augusto
dc.contributor.authorFarias, Izeni P.
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Maria Nazareth Ferreira da
dc.contributor.authorAnciães, Marina
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-15T21:36:02Z
dc.date.available2020-06-15T21:36:02Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractSeveral hypotheses have been used to explain diversification in the Neotropics. Integrating evolution with ecology extends the scope of testing the frameworks of these hypotheses. We test diversification hypotheses by integrating phylogeography and ecological niche models (ENMs) using the rodent Hylaeamys megacephalus (Azara’s broad-headed oryzomys or large headed rice rat) of the Amazon and dry forests, as a model. We estimated divergence times, ancestral areas, diversification events, historical demography, haplotype sharing, and genetic distances based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. We generated ENMs and tested for niche divergence between lineages; integrated genetic data to predict gene flow corridors; and projected paleodistributions for comparison with historical demography. We found high structuring in northern Amazonia on the left bank of the Amazon River, and less structure but secondary contact in southern Amazonia and dry forests. The Northern Amazonian lineage diverged from the other lineages through dispersal followed by vicariance due to the Amazon River about 1.35 Mya, while the Southern Amazonian and Cerrado lineages diverged through dispersal about 0.78 Mya. Paleodistribution models revealed expansions of dry forest lineages consistent with the Refugia Hypothesis, but not retraction for the humid forest lineage, which were not congruent with historical demography data. Niche divergence was not supported for the Northern Amazonian lineage, whereas habitat corridors linking current lineages suggest environmental continuity to their distributions that is concordant with a riverine barrier. In contrast, niche divergence was supported between the Southern Amazonian and Cerrado lineages, indicating that isolation followed by ecological divergence likely acted on this diversification. The recent Amazon River barrier and ecological differentiation observed here will surely provide insight for future studies and hypotheses of biodiversity diversification in the Neotropics. Studies that integrate evolution and ecology promise to disentangle alternative hypotheses and shed light on the biogeography of this megadiverse region. © 2019, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10682-019-09968-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/16737
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.publisher.journalEvolutionary Ecologypt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVolume 33, Número 1, Pags. 111-148pt_BR
dc.rightsRestrito*
dc.subjectBiodiversityen
dc.subjectBiogeographyen
dc.subjectCerradoen
dc.subjectDifferentiationen
dc.subjectDispersalen
dc.subjectDivergenceen
dc.subjectDry Foresten
dc.subjectEvolutionen
dc.subjectGene Flowen
dc.subjectGenetic Variationen
dc.subjectHypothesis Testingen
dc.subjectNeotropical Regionen
dc.subjectPhylogeographyen
dc.subjectRefugeen
dc.subjectRodenten
dc.subjectSpeciation (biology)en
dc.subjectVicarianceen
dc.subjectAmazon Riveren
dc.subjectMyaen
dc.subjectOryzomysen
dc.subjectOryzomys Capitoen
dc.subjectRodentiaen
dc.titleIntegrating phylogeography and ecological niche modelling to test diversification hypotheses using a Neotropical rodenten
dc.typeArtigopt_BR

Arquivos

Coleções