Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15524
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Iokanam Sales-
dc.contributor.authordo Nascimento, Henrique E.Mendonça-
dc.contributor.authorVicari, Matheus Boni-
dc.contributor.authorDisney, Mathias I.-
dc.contributor.authorDeLucia, Evan H.-
dc.contributor.authornull, Tomas-
dc.contributor.authorKruijt, Bart J.-
dc.contributor.authorLapola, David Montenegro-
dc.contributor.authorMeir, Patrick W.-
dc.contributor.authorNorby, Richard J.-
dc.contributor.authorOmetto, Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud-
dc.contributor.authorQuesada, Carlos Alberto-
dc.contributor.authorRammig, Anja-
dc.contributor.authorHofhansl, Florian-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-14T16:32:39Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-14T16:32:39Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15524-
dc.description.abstractTropical vegetation biomass represents a key component of the carbon stored in global forest ecosystems. Estimates of aboveground biomass commonly rely on measurements of tree size (diameter and height) and then indirectly relate, via allometric relationships and wood density, to biomass sampled from a relatively small number of harvested and weighed trees. Recently, however, novel in situ remote sensing techniques have been proposed, which may provide nondestructive alternative approaches to derive biomass estimates. Nonetheless, we still lack knowledge of the measurement uncertainties, as both the calibration and validation of estimates using different techniques and instruments requires consistent assessment of the underlying errors. To that end, we investigate different approaches estimating the tropical aboveground biomass in situ. We quantify the total and systematic errors among measurements obtained from terrestrial light detection and ranging (LiDAR), hypsometer-based trigonometry, and traditional forest inventory. We show that laser-based estimates of aboveground biomass are in good agreement (< 10% measurement uncertainty) with traditional measurements. However, relative uncertainties vary among the allometric equations based on the vegetation parameters used for parameterization. We report the error metrics for measurements of tree diameter and tree height and discuss the consequences for estimated biomass. Despite methodological differences detected in this study, we conclude that laser-based electronic devices could complement conventional measurement techniques, thereby potentially improving estimates of tropical vegetation biomass. © 2019 by the authors.en
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVolume 11, Número 5pt_BR
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/*
dc.subjectBiomassen
dc.subjectEcosystemsen
dc.subjectElectronic Equipmenten
dc.subjectForestryen
dc.subjectInstrument Errorsen
dc.subjectOptical Radaren
dc.subjectRemote Sensingen
dc.subjectSystematic Errorsen
dc.subjectThermoelectric Equipmenten
dc.subjectTropicsen
dc.subjectVegetationen
dc.subjectAmazoniaen
dc.subjectCarbon Storageen
dc.subjectForest Structureen
dc.subjectLight Detection And Rangingen
dc.subject"terra Firme" Foresten
dc.subjectTerrestrial Laser Scanningen
dc.subjectUncertainty Analysisen
dc.titlePerformance of laser-based electronic devices for structural analysis of Amazonian terra-firme forestsen
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs11050510-
dc.publisher.journalRemote Sensingpt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
artigo-inpa.pdf6,34 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons